Applicant filed in this Court an application for review. Respondent opposed the application. The grounds for review were worded as follows;
“The Disciplinary Committee was not properly composed as provided for in terms of …Both employees’ representatives and workers representatives were not part of the Disciplinary Committee and yet statute detects (sic) that they out to have been there.
2. The Appeals Official denied Applicant the right to be heard when he dealt with the matter in the absence of the Applicant…” More
This is an urgent chamber application in which the applicant is seeking an order declaring that the dispossession of the applicant by the respondent of a mining claim named Canbrae 4 M5341, claim number 10779, measuring 2 hectares and situated in Mazowe (“the property“) in the absence of an order of court is wrongful and unlawful and that the respondent be ordered to return peaceful and undisturbed possession of the property within twenty-four (24) hours of service of this Order on the respondent. More
This is an application for review against the Appeals Officer’s decision whereby he dismissed the Applicant’s internal appeal against the decision of the Hearing Officer.
The brief facts of the matter are that applicant who was employed by the Respondent as a Sourcing Specialist Manager in the Procurement Department was charged and found guilty of contravening section 4 (a) of the National Employment Code SI 15/2006. It was alleged that she committed “any act of conduct on omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of his or her conduct. More
MOYO J: This is an application to amend pleadings. The founding affidavit refers to the notice of intention to amend as the one that gives the nature of the amendments sought. The founding affidavit goes further to state that the court has a wide discretion to grant an amendment to pleadings where such amendment is notmala fide and will not lead to an incurable prejudice to the other party. Applicant further states that the amendment will allow a proper ventilation of the issues between the papers. The applicant further states that the delay in seeking the amendment is not great. More
The applicant has made numerous applications in pursuit of bail pending appeal. The record shows he filed an application for bail pending the determination of an application for leave to appeal out of time which was pending under case number CON 319/19. That application was filed on 7 November 2019. The applicant filed a supplementary bail statement on 9 December 2019. The application was removed from roll by NDEWERE J on 14 November 2019. The reason for the removal of the application from the roll was that the applicant was required to first obtain leave to appeal out of time... More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The application is at the instance of the applicant bank which was irked by the labour court’s decision to dismiss its appeal where it challenged the decision of the NEC Appeals board decision to remit a labour dispute between the employee and the bank More
This is an appeal against the decision of the NEC Appeals Committee for the banking sector. The background to the matter is that NEC got seized with the matter after the respondent employee and the appellant employer had been before the hearing officer and before the Grievance and disciplinary Committee (GDC). Before the hearing officer and before the GDC the employee had been found guilty of conduct inconsistent with her duties and she had been duly dismissed from employment. More
