This is an application for condonation of the late noting of an appeal to the Labour court. The background to the matter is that the applicants lost their jobs with City of Mutare following disciplinary proceedings into their alleged acts of misconduct. Internal appeals by applicants were unsuccessful. Finally, applicants approached the labour officer with a view to him assessing the correctness or otherwise of the internal processes. During the course of the proceedings before the labour officer it dawned on the applicants, the respondent and the labour officer that the labour officer lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter on...
More
The appellant, Mr Muzavazi (Muzavazi) is employed by the respondent as a Finance Manager. He was charged with violating s 4 (a) of the National Code of Conduct Statutory Instrument 15/06 (S.I. 15/06) that is, an act of conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of his contract.
More
The applicant is employed by the respondent as its Chief Executive Officer from 2014.
Disciplinary proceedings were commenced against applicant on 25 February 2020 as a result of which the applicant was suspended pending disciplinary proceedings. He is, in these proceedings challenging the manner in which he was suspended and the
employer’s decision to institute disciplinary proceedings against him. The applicant prays for reinstatement without loss of salary and benefits.
More
The applicants seek the following relief: -
1. The Great Zimbabwe University Pension Fund Benefit Reduction Resolution dated 19 January 2017 pursuant to a meeting of the respondents held on 8th of December 2016 at Masvingo in terms of which the employer contribution rate was reduced from 17,29% to 7,5% effective October 2012 and the Group Life Assurance benefit was reduced from four times to two times annual salary effective 1st January 2017 is declared invalid, unlawful in its entirety and consequently set aside and the status quoante is restored.
More
This is an application for review.
The background is that the applicant was employed by the Respondent before charges of non-compliance with established procedures/standing instructions, making false report or giving false statement or evidence, and neglect of duty were levelled against him.
More