This is an application for the review of the decision of the respondent’s employer’s decision to dismiss the applicant employee from employment following allegations of misconduct against the applicant employee. More
By way of a brief back ground and so far as the pleadings give insight to the matter, the Plaintiff Augur Investments OU is a peregrine private company incorporated in Mauritius under the laws of that country. It is also registered in Zimbabwe as a foreign company and carries on business in Zimbabwe. The second plaintiff Tatiana Aleshina is a private individual whilst the third plaintiff Kenneth Sharpe is described as an adult male with repute as a businessman. The first defendant Tendai Biti is an adult male and a legal practitioner whilst the second defendant Movement for Democratic Change... More
Plaintiff issued summons claiming the following:-
(1) The payment of the sum of ZWL$3000,0001-00, being damages for pain and suffering arising from a slip and fall accident which occurred on 13 March 2019.
(2) The payment of US2000-00 on the bank rate equivalent in ZWL, being damages for future medical expenses arising from a slip and fall accident which occurred on 13 March 2019.
(3) Interest at the prescribed rate from the date of summons.
(4) Costs of suit. More
The applicant, Auriga Mineral Exploration (Pvt) Ltd, a holder of an Exclusive Prospecting Order Number 1806 (EPO 1806) which it says was issued in 2021 for a three-year period has brought this urgent application for an interdict. The basis is that the first respondent Korzim Strategic Minerals (Pvt) Ltd, has dangerously mined across a road by constructing a tunnel underneath it on the Shamva–Nyagande Road. The Applicant says it detected mining activities in its prospecting area on the 3rd of November 2023 through satellite images and went on an investigative mission to the site. It found dangerous workings on site... More
This is an appeal against the whole of a judgment of the Magistrate Court (the court a quo) dated 29 August 2022, which granted a binding over order to keep the peace in favour of the respondent, and ordered the appellant to keep peace and stay away from Subdivision 3 of Darnaway Farm. More
The applicant is on trial before the first respondent, charged with criminal abuse of duty as a public officer as defined in s 174(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The definition of the crime was recently amended. The amendments have no bearing on the issues raised by this review since the crime was allegedly committed before the amendments. More
This is an appeal against conviction and sentence. The appellant was convicted of rape as defined in s 65(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. He was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment of which 3 years were suspended for 5 years on the usual condition of good behaviour, to leave the effective custodial term of 5 years. More
