Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
The appellant appeals against the whole judgment of the Labour Court (the court a quo), which was handed down on 9 January 2015. The court a quo dismissed his appeal against the determination of the disciplinary authority, which found him guilty of misconduct and dismissed him from employment. More

1. The appeal against conviction having been abandoned at the hearing, this judgment disposes of the appeal against the sentence imposed on each appellant. 2. The appellants were convicted after a protracted trial on a charge of fraud as defined in s 136 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. Each was sentenced to 48 months imprisonment of which 12 months were suspended for 5 years on the usual conditions of good behavior, to leave an effective sentence of 36 months imprisonment. More

This is an application for condonation and also for leave to appeal this court’s judgement number LC/H/250/19 to the Supreme Court. More

This is an urgent chamber application wherein the applicant is seeking the following order: “TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final should not be made in the following terms: - 1. It is declared that the applicant is not an exporter or a partial exporter for the purposes of Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe enacted the Exchange Control (Payment for Electricity and Related Services in Foreign Currency by Exporters and Partial Exporters) Order, 2019, Statutory Instrument 249/19. 2. The respondent be and is hereby directed to rebill the applicant in Zimbabwe Dollars... More

The following are the reasons informing the ex-tempore judgment delivered on 17 April 2023 dismissing applicant’s application for bail pending trial. They (reasons) are being provided at the request of the applicants. More

This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court (court a quo) in which the court granted an application for the registration of the judgment of the Labour Court amounting to US $177 408.00 in favour of the respondent. More

1. The 1st defendant’s conduct of registering 4th defendant using forged documentation be declared fraudulent and consequently all actions flowing there from be declared a nullity, in particular: - a) That the registration of Wozheri Stone Crushers (Private) Limited by the 5th respondent on the 29 November 2017 be declared null and void and consequently set aside. b) The memorandum of agreement entered in between the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant on 28 November 2017 be declared null and void and of no force. c) Transfer of the mining claims, Jilikin 25 registration number 12641 BM from the 1st... More