This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 13 January 2021 under judgment No. HH 25-21. The court a quo dismissed the appellants’ claims in HC 7760/18 and HC 7843/18, which had been consolidated, upon finding that the appellants had no locus standi in judicio to seek the cancellation of two agreements of sale viz; one between Village Inn (Pvt) Ltd and Tatipano Properties (Pvt ) Ltd and the other between Folay Investments (Pvt)Ltd and Paradise Road (Pvt) Ltd. More
1. This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Labour Court of Zimbabwe (the court a quo) sitting at Harare dated 27 July 2022. After hearing submissions from the appellant and counsel for the respondent, the court dismissed the appeal with costs indicating that reasons for the order would be given in due course. These are the reasons. More
The Applicant was employed by the Respondent as a Management Accountant. His employment was terminated in 2001 following a restructuring exercise. Dissatisfied he challenged the termination in this court. On 13 April, 2004 under reference, Edward Gutai Marimo Mudyavanhu vs. Cairns Foods Limited LC/H/35/2004 my sister, Honourable Makamure J found that Applicant was wrongfully dismissed from employment and directed payment in damages in compensation. In 2009 Applicant filed an application for quantification of damages. On 27th May 2009 under judgement reference LC/H/66/2009 Honourable Mhuri J, quantified the total damages payable in the amount of Zimbabwean Dollars $ 26 076 252.00.... More
This is an appeal against both conviction and sentence. The appellant was convicted after a full trial, of rape as defined in s 65 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. He was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment.
The appellant was found by the court a quo to have raped the complainant from 2011 to 2015 during the time that the complainant was living at the appellant’s residence. The complainant is a daughter of the late sister of the appellant’s wife. She regarded the appellant as her “father”. The appellant was aged 46 years old at the... More
The crux of the applicants’ case is that they are aggrieved by construction work commenced by the first respondent in their residential area. They aver that the first respondent has begun ground work for the construction of a fuel station and a fast food outlet at Stand Number 5273 Churchill Avenue, Harare (hereinafter called “the property”). Additionally, the applicants contend that a commercial outlet in this residential area would result in the disruption of the peaceful life they enjoy in their neighborhood. In particular, the complaint is that the operation of a fuel station in the area would expose residents... More
At the onset of oral argument in this Court respondent raised 2 points in limine which applicant opposed.
1. That the application is in improper form
2.That the application is fatally defective for failure to comply with prescribed time limits More
