Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by year
The matter was placed before me as a chamber application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against a judgment of this court rendered under reference LC/H/280/23 on the 22nd of September, 2023. The application which is premised on section 92F(2) of the Labour Act [Cap 28:01] as read with Rule 43 of the Labour Court rules, 2017 is opposed by the 1st Respondent. The 2nd Respondent is cited as a nominal Respondent. More

This is an appeal against the whole composite judgement of the High Court of Zimbabwe dated 31 October 2023 in which the court a quo dismissed an application for the setting aside of an arbitral award, under HCHC328/23 and granted an application for the registration of the same award, under HCHC 188/23. More

This is an application for rescission of judgment as provided in terms of Rule 40 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. More

[1] The applicant in this matter seeks an order to set aside an arbitral ruling [2] issued by the second respondent on 16 May 2024 in the arbitration proceedings between the applicant and the first respondent. Specifically, the applicant prays for the substitution of the arbitrator’s finding that she had jurisdiction to hear the dispute between the applicant and the first respondent with an order that the arbitral tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear the dispute. More

This is an application for reinstatement of a matter. This is a result of the matter having deemed abandoned by the Registrar because of Applicant’s non-compliance of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. More

This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court (the court a quo) wherein it dismissed an application for a declaratory order sought by the appellant. More

This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Labour Court (the court a quo) wherein it upheld the respondent’s appeal and set aside the decision of the designated agent who found that the termination of the respondent’s employment by the appellant was lawful. More