On the 31st May 2023 at Harare F Mutambirwa in her capacity as a Designated Agent made a determination. She ordered Respondent (employer) to pay Appellant, (employee) an amount of US$2, 563, 56 in respect of notice pay, service pay and leave pay. Appellant then appealed against the determination to this Court in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
1. This is an appeal against the entire judgment of the High Court (“the court a quo”), wherein it dismissed the appellant’s application for condonation for the late filing of an application for the upliftment of the bar, to file an appearance to defend, as well as the application for the upliftment of the bar itself. More
This was a chamber application for condonation and upliftment of bar. The applicant, CFI Holdings Limited [“CFI Holdings”] is one of five defendants sued by the first respondent, Stalap Investments [Private] Limited [“Stalap Investments”], in the main action under the case reference number HC 1855-20 [“the main action”]. More
At the onset of oral argument in this Court, respondent raised three (3) points in limine which appellant opposed. The points shall be dealt with ad seriatim. More
This is an application for rescission of a default judgment entered against the applicant on 22nd May 2023. It is opposed. The background of the matter is that the applicant is a former employee of the respondent. The applicant alleged that the respondent did not pay her terminal benefits when the parties parted ways .The matter was taken to a designated agent
.The designated agent dismissed the applicant’s claim. The applicant then approached this Court on review and the matter was struck off the roll for non- compliance with the Rules . She then made an application for reinstatement of... More
This is an appeal against the decision of the respondent employer’s General Manager where he upheld the guilty verdict and dismissal penalty meted out on appellant employee following allegations of disobedience to a lawful order, fraud and conduct inconsistent with his employment in breach of the respondents’ code of conduct. More
