Applicant applied to this Court for the review of disciplinary proceedings against her conducted by respondent. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1) d1 of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereby called the Act. Respondents opposed the application. More
This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Two issues arose at the commencement of the proceedings. The first issue was that Applicants’ legal practitioner was of the view that this was a composite application for condonation AND an application for leave to appeal both to be heard at the same time. After an exchange of pleasantries, it was resolved that the application for condonation was to be heard and a decision made which could then lead to an application for leave to appeal. More
This is an application in terms of s 4(1) of Administrative Justice Act [Chapter 10:28] which seeks to set aside the decision of the first respondent to repossess applicant’s stand and sell it to second and third respondents. The brief facts giving rise to this application are that in March 2007 applicant accepted an offer from first respondent for the purchase of stand number 7403 Manyame Park. A lease agreement was executed between these two parties. In 2022 after visiting first respondent’s office applicant learnt that the lease agreement had been cancelled and his stand repossessed from him in 2019.... More
The Appellant is employed as a Divisional Intelligence Officer by the Respondent. Proceedings of the Disciplinary hearing were conducted to inquire into and report on allegations that the Appellant had signed two contracts on behalf of the Central Intelligence Organisation with Leggim Enterprises worth forty eight thousand, nine hundred and seventy eight United States Dollars and seventy six cents ($48 978.76) and twenty eight thousand one hundred and twenty four United States Dollars and twenty cents (US $28 124.20) for the construction of a store room and water and oil separator without authority from the Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) PIO... More
This is an appeal against the entire judgment of the Labour Court (the court a quo) sitting at Harare which confirmed the arbitrator’s award against the appellant. More
On 5 August 2022, the plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming the total amount of one hundred thousand United States dollars being fifty thousand United States dollars for adultery damages and another fifty thousand United States dollars for loss of consortium and companionship. This was later amended following the defendant’s plea to fifty thousand United States dollars for loss of consortium and conjugal rights and fifty thousand United States dollars for contumelia. More
The application was placed before the court was one of stay of execution. The basis for seeking stay of execution is stated as being that the applicants have discharged the debt outstanding. A sum of United States dollars, fifty thousand was paid in cash and the remainder of USD$40 000 plus interest was settled through Zimbabwean currency equivalent to this amount. On the other hand, the first respondent contends that payment of the outstanding balance should be in United States Dollars. Therefore, payment of the outstanding amount in any other currency than United States dollars is a non-event. More
