This is an appeal against the decision of the National Employment Council for the welfare and Educational Institutions, appeals committee.
Background
The respondent was engaged by the appellant as a Human Resources Officer. Allegations of misconduct were raised against her that she had misrepresented facts to Tear Fund. She was dismissed on 13 September 2021. The appellant (employer) stated that she had pleaded guilty to the allegations. She appealed to the appeals authority which set aside the dismissal penalty on procedural grounds and invited the parties to appear before it and make representation as to mitigation and aggravation. The respondent... More
The applicant’s case as presented in the pleadings, in brief, is that around 25 July 2022, he agreed with the first respondent that he would bring his car, Mercedes Benz, Registration number AEX 8962 (hereinafter called “the vehicle”) to the first respondent’s garage for repairs. The applicant further alleged that he intended to sell the vehicle after repairs. The applicant further alleges that he did not authorise the first respondent to sell the vehicle. It is the applicant’s case that he agreed with the first respondent that the vehicle would be repaired within three days. More
Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The appeal was made in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01]. The grounds of appeal were initially quadruple. Appellant then abandoned ground 1, 3 and 4 leaving only ground (2) two for determination. Ground (2) two is quoted thus as follows:
“Both the hearing officer and the appeals Committee failed to note and casted a blind eye on the contradictions between the charge sheet at the loss controllers report and the subsequent apologies by the loss controllers thereof. In the circumstances the hearing officer... More
This is an application for rescission of a default judgment granted by this Court on 7 November 2023.
The brief procedural history of the matter is as follows. First Respondent filed an appeal with this Court in Case Number LC/H/18/23. On the hearing date, that is, 31 May 2023, Applicant was in default and the Court allowed the appeal. Applicant thereafter did not file an application for rescission timeously. This led to the filing of an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for rescission of judgment under case Number LC/H/747/23. On the hearing date, which was... More
ZHOU J: This is a court application to dispose of a minor’s share in the immovable property known as stand number 156 Monavale Township of Mayfield Estate measuring 999 square metres held under Deed of Transfer number 4186/2010. More
This is an appeal against the determination of the Respondent’s Appeals Authority which determination was handed down on the 19th of May 2023 and served on Appellant on the 23rd of May, 2023.
The material background facts to the matter are as follows. The Appellant was employed by the Respondent as a Loss Control Manager. On the 17th of April 2023 he was notified that, following a complaint by his immediate supervisor, the Respondent had reason to believe he had committed two acts of misconduct namely;
(i) Contravention of Section 4 (g) of Statutory Instrument 15 of 2006 i.e. habitual... More
Plaintiff caused the issuance of summons against the defendants wherein he claimed:
1. Payment of an amount of US$ 10 402.42 (ten thousand four hundred and two United States dollars and forty two cents) being the duty amount levied by ZIMRA on a vehicle sold to plaintiff by defendants.
2. Payment of car hire charges at the rate of RTGS 600 (six hundred RTGS dollars) per day from 18 December 2019 to the date of release of the vehicle from ZIMRA or to the date of full refund of the purchase price by defendants.
3. Alternatively, failing (1) above, the... More
