This is an appeal against the decision of the Magistrates’ Court sitting at Harare refusing all the seventy- four (74) appellants admission to bail. The decision was delivered on 27 June 2024. The demographics of the appellants is interesting. They were not a random assembly. Instead, they hail from different but clearly defined clusters predominantly the suburbs of Chitungwiza, Epworth and Hatcliffe which account for almost three quarters of the appellants. Equally noteworthy is the fact that fifty-seven of the appellants are not formally employed and that over sixty of them are aged below forty years. They are of the... More
Plaintiff approached the court seeking to have an agreement of sale dated 11 March 2011 concerning house number C44 Chegutu be declared void and of no force. She also sought to be declared the lawful holder of title and rights to the same property. In addition, she sought consequential relief of the eviction of second defendant and all those claiming occupation through him from the property. More
In this civil trial the plaintiff led evidenced from one witness and closed his case. The 1st 2nd and 3rd defendants have applied for absolution from the instance at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff resists the applications. More
The plaintiffs being children of the late Taworamwoyo Nelson Dhliwayo, who died on 10 June 2016, issued summons against the defendants in February 2023, for an order declaring null and void, a will which the late executed on 8 June 2012. That Will excluded as beneficiaries the plaintiffs who are all his children.
In their summons, they challenged the Will on the basis that it was invalid as the now deceased, at the time of the Will’s execution, was said to have not been in a mental state to execute a valid will because he suffered from senile dementia. In... More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court (the court a quo) handed down on 16 December 2021. The court a quo granted the respondent damages in the sum of US$30 000.00 for malicious prosecution and US$100 000.00 for malicious arrest and detention. The damages were to be paid at the equivalent rate of the local currency of RTGS reckoned at the time of payment. More
In May 2017 the Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a verbal agreement of sale where the Defendant paid the Plaintiff US$3000.00 for the delivery of a motor vehicle. The Defendant having received the US$3000.00 then failed to deliver the agreed motor vehicle. The motor vehicle was supposed to have been delivered within a week of the payment and the Plaintiff failed to perform this contractual obligation and subsequently became unreachable to the Defendant. The Defendant only managed to make contact with the Plaintiff after the Defendant reported the matter to Southerton Police Station. The Plaintiff eventually paid the Defendant ZWL$3000.00... More
The respondent filed a court application for rescission of default judgment in terms of Rule 29 of the High Court Rules 2021. The applicant proceeded to file its notice of opposition on the 30 of June 2022. On 19 July 2022, respondent filed its answering affidavit which was served on the applicant on the 20th of July 2022. One month has since lapsed and the respondent has not applied for the set down of the matter or taken any further procedural step within 1 (one) month from 20th of July 2022. Resultantly, the respondent has failed to prosecute its application... More
