Plaintiff is a duly registered company that owns and operates a lodge in Kwekwe commonly referred to as Golden Acres Lodge. 1st Defendant is a Belgian national who is temporarily resident in Zimbabwe as a visitor and a Director of the 2nd Defendant. Plaintiff instituted an action proceedings against the Defendants for the payment of US$72 133.00 being the amount due and owing for accommodation provided to the Defendants as well as laundry, car hire, typing, and printing services. More
This is an application for confirmation of two draft rulings in terms of section 93 (5a) of the Labour Act, (Chapter 28:01). Applicant was represented by Mr. Gundumura.
Mr. Gundumura, in motivating the confirmation of the application, stated that he abided by the documents filed of record and urged the Court to confirm the draft rulings. More
The applicant sought an order compelling the respondent to deliver a lease agreement signed between the parties in respect of a property known as stand number 32393 Unit K. After hearing arguments from parties and having considered documents filed of record, the court granted the following order after handing down a brief ex tempore ruling: More
This is an appeal and cross appeal against the decision of the designated agent who ruled that appellant had been irregularly dismissed and ordered that he be reinstated without loss of salary and benefits or that he be paid damages for the loss of his job as a watchman with the respondent employer. More
This urgent court application was filed in terms of r 59(6) of the High Court Rules, 2021. The applicant seeks spoliatory relief and other interdicts pending the resolution of a shareholder dispute that is currently before arbitration tribunal. That dispute is concerned with a joint venture arrangement between the applicant and the first respondent that involves the affairs of the second respondent. The second, third and fourth respondents were cited as interested parties. They did not oppose the application and were not represented at the hearing. More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 as read with Rule 20(1) of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondent opposed the application. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the designated agent who found that appellant was guilty of habitual neglect of his duties and penalised him with dismissal.
Facts of the matter are that appellant was accused of habitual neglect of duty where it was said that he was in the habit of taking sick time off and upon expiration of the sick leave he would not come back to work thus prejudicing the operations of the respondent where the appellant’s duties involved team work with a colleague who would end up working alone in appellant’s absence to the detriment... More
