The applicants approached this court seeking rescission of a default judgment granted against the 3rd and 4th applicants in case number HC 5359/23. The order granted in default seeks the eviction of the said applicants and all those occupying the premises through them from the church premises being Stand 2666 Rujeko Township Marondera. More
This is an application for Stay of Execution pending the determination of an application for rescission of an order for the eviction of the third and fourth applicants from church premises as per the Judgement and Court Order under case number HC 5359/23. The order also directs the eviction from church premises all those occupying the said premises through the third and fourth applicants. More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interim interdict, in particular for what is commonly referred to as an anti-dissipation interdict. This form of an interdict is a summary order meant to preserve assets by restraining their disposal pending the determination of a dispute involving the parties. The dispute pending is an action matter Case No. HC1349/24 initiated by the applicant against the first respondent. More
This is an application for review in terms of ss 92EE (1) of the Labour Act , Chapter 28:01 ARW rule 20(1) of the Labour Court Rules 2017(the Rules), against the proceedings of the 1st Respondent (Designated officer) that was conducted on 13 November and concluded on the 24 November 2023. More
This is a divorce action wherein what is to be determined in the trial is couched as follows in the joint pretrial conference minute: -
“The constitution and distribution of matrimonial assets.” More
Applicant (employer) applied to this Court for condonation of a late review in terms of Rule 22 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. 1st Respondent (employee) opposed the application. Applicant intends to file for review of proceedings and ruling before and by 2nd Respondent (Labour Officer) on 7th August 2023. More
The reason behind these unusual circumstances was caused by a major dispute between applicant and its second set of legal practitioners. Basing on the withdrawals and tendering of wasted costs by applicant second to fifth respondents raised a bill of costs for taxation. There were a number of postponements to the hearing for the taxation of the bill of costs leading to the hearing on 25 June 2024. At the taxation, applicant was legally represented. It was clarified that the bill of costs was predicated upon the tendered wasted costs when heads of argument and notice of opposition were withdrawn... More
