This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for Review. The facts, which are common cause are that the Second Respondent rendered a determination which served on the Applicant on 5 June 2024. In terms of the Rules, Applicant was supposed to the application for Review within 21 days. This was not done. Applicant has therefore approached this Court for condonation. More
The applicant and the first respondent are wife and husband respectively who took the solemn vows of marriage on 27 December 2008. Their marriage was blessed with four children who are now aged 22, 16, and the youngest who are twins are aged 14 years. This case ex facie renders sufficient testimony that the fountains of love between these two rival parties have long dried up and that the marriage now remains only on paper. When the parties appeared before me, I did not hesitate to ask them together with their counsels why so much exertion, emotion, sweat and expense... More
The applicant prays for a review of the matter and an order that the penalty conditions imposed by the Commissioner General under REF HQ 10/50/180/2023 be set aside and the motor vehicle a Toyota Fortuner be released unconditionally to him.
The background of the matter is that applicant entered Zimbabwe via the Beitbridge Border Post in a Toyota Fortuner which he alleges was driven by one Simbarashe Ngoshi and which he had been given and authorised to drive by the owner Tongesai Chigwamba. Notably this version of events in its detail is impugned by the respondent through documentation and analysis... More
The Appellant was employed by the Respondent in the position of Housing Allocation Clerk but was working as an Acting Assistant Research Officer in the department of Housing and Community Services. The Respondent convened a disciplinary hearing for the Appellant on the 3rd of August 2020. The Appellant was to answer to two charges, namely (1) contravention clause 10.5 (f) alternatively clause 10.5(t) of part VI of the Collective Bargaining Agreement; Harare Municipal Undertaking (Employment Code of Conduct) Statutory Instrument 13 of 2015, Clause 10.5(f) related to a charge of Fraud which is defined under the relevant code to mean,... More
On 28 April 2023 the Labour Court (the court a quo) dismissed an application for review made by the appellant. The appellant was dissatisfied by that outcome and filed the present appeal before this Court. More
The applicant is seeking the following interim relief:
“Pending determination of this matter, the applicant is granted the following relief:
IT IS ORDERED:
1.That pending the return day, the execution of the warrant of ejectment and execution against property issued by the Registrar of the High Court under R-HCH 3300/23 on 27 February 2025 in respect of the Muziti Assembly be and is hereby stayed.
2.That the respondents who opposed this order shall pay costs of this application on a legal practitioner and client scale.” More
This is an application for an interdict, in which the applicant seeks an order couched in the following terms:
i. The respondents be and are hereby interdicted from disturbing the applicant’s peaceful possession and use of subdivision 4 of Lot 34 AB of Middle Sabi, Chipinge District.
ii. The respondents shall not verbally, or physically threaten to assault, kill or prevent the applicant, his family, his workers, contractors or agents from carrying out any farming activities on subdivision 4 of Lot 3B AB of Middle Sabi, Chipinge District.
iii. The respondents shall pay the costs of this application jointly and... More
