This an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of section 92 F (2) of the Labour Act, (Chapter 28:01) and Rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. This Court rendered judgment in Case Number LC/H/364/24 on 6 August 2024. Applicant is dissatisfied with the decision More
This matter was struck off the roll of unopposed matters after a request was made by Mr. Mutsvairo who represented the applicant on the 14th of November 2024. Mr Muchengeti representing the 1st respondent requested for reasons. More
This is an application for rescission of a default judgment entered against the applicants. It is opposed.
In order for an application of this nature to succeed requirements which include the following must be met :((i) the reasonableness of the explanation for the default;( ii) the bona fides of the application to rescind the judgment and (iii)the bona fides of the defence on the merits of the case and whether that defence carries prospects of success. More
The applicant appeared before a regional court sitting in Chinhoyi facing ten (10) counts of robbery under RCHN 360/22. He also appeared before the same court under RCHN 338/22 facing seven (7) counts of robbery. More
This is an application for a declaratur and consequential relief wherein the applicant seeks an order in the following terms:
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. The discharge of the applicant from the regular officer cadet training course and the army by the respondents be and is hereby declared to be unlawful and wrongful.
2. The respondents be and are hereby ordered to reinstate the applicant into the regular officer cadet training course at the Zimbabwe Military Academy – Gweru and the army at least not later than 14 days from the date of this order.
3. The respondents are ordered... More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision rendered by this Court on the 24th of January 2025 under Case Number LC/H/1174/24 and Judgment No. LC/H/27/25. The application is brought in terms of section 92 (F) (1) of the Labour Act, [Chapter 28:01]. More
Applicant applied to this Court for condonation of a belated review. The application was made in terms of Rule 22 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondents opposed the application. The pertinent parts of the founding affidavit stated that; More
