This judgment disposes of two applications. Case number HC 1129/23 is an application for the setting aside of an arbitral award handed down by the arbitrator on 18 November 2022 while HC 7965/22 is an application for the registration of the same award More
Applicants applied to this Court for the review of the determination issued by Designated Agent T. Marisa on 30th November 2024 at Harare. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1) 1(d) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. Respondent opposed the application More
At the onset of oral argument in this Court both parties raised points in limine.
Respondent
Respondent raised a single point to the effect that there were no valid grounds for review. More
This is an application for quantification of damages in lieu of reinstatement. Applicant was employed by the Respondent. Allegations of misconduct were levelled against leading to his conviction and subsequent dismissal from employment. He approached this Court on appeal but the appeal was dismissed. Applicant appealed to the Supreme Court and the decision of this Court was set aside with the Supreme Court issuing the following Order: More
On the 23rd September 2024 at Harare, Arbitrator B Mudiwa issued an award wherein he dismissed appellant’s claim of unlawful termination of employment by respondent. Appellant then appealed the award to this Court in terms of Section 98(10) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
Appellant appealed to this Court against a determination made by the Designated Agent of the NEC for the Funeral Industry. The appeal was made in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
On 11th December 2023 at Harare, Designated Agent A Chimedza issued a determination. He ordered appellant to reinstate respondent or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. Appellant then appealed the determination to this Court. The appeal was made in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01(hereafter called the Act). Respondent opposed the appeal. More
