This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision rendered by this Court on the 24th of January 2025 under Case Number LC/H/1174/24 and Judgment No. LC/H/27/25. The application is brought in terms of section 92 (F) (1) of the Labour Act, [Chapter 28:01]. More
Applicant applied to this Court for condonation of a belated review. The application was made in terms of Rule 22 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondents opposed the application. The pertinent parts of the founding affidavit stated that; More
On 26 February 2025 this court issued orders for the following matter: LCH 1270/24 GMB v Tobaiwa and LCH 1272/24 GMB v Zinyowa. The terms of the orders were the following: -
1. Application under LCH 1270/24 be and is hereby consolidated with application under LCH 1272/24.
2. Application for a declaration be and is hereby struck off the roll with costs for the reason that it is improperly before the court. More
On 26 February 2025 this court issued orders for the following matter: LCH 1270/24 GMB v Tobaiwa and LCH 1272/24 GMB v Zinyowa. The terms of the orders were the following: -
1. Application under LCH 1270/24 be and is hereby consolidated with application under LCH 1272/24.
2. Application for a declaration be and is hereby struck off the roll with costs for the reason that it is improperly before the court. More
MUNANGATI - MANONGWA J: The parties herein have requested for reasons for judgment and these are they: The applicant approached this court seeking the following relief;
1. That the respondent and all persons claiming occupation through her shall vacate stand number 282 Chadcombe Township of stand 221B Chadcombe Township,
2. Harare, measuring 4109 square metres, otherwise known as Stand 282 Kaye Eddie Dr, Chadcombe, Harare, within seven days from the date of this order failing which the Sheriff for Zimbabwe shall evict them from the property and give the applicant vacant possession thereof.
3. That Applicant pays costs of suit... More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Magistrates’ Court sitting in
Victoria Falls, upholding the first respondent’s (“Khayelihle Properties (Private)
Limited”) claim for eviction against the appellant, Mugandwini. Before the court a quo,
the second respondent- Chitonga neither defended the action seeking the eviction of the
appellant, nor participated in this appeal.
[2] For convenience and ease of reference, and where the context permits, the parties shall
be referred to as per their designations in this court or by their n More
The plaintiff is a medical aid society the members and beneficiaries for which are employees of the Harare Municipality, a local authority. The first defendant is a businessman, with direct or indirect beneficial interest in the second defendant, a private company duly registered in Zimbabwe. During the trial of this matter, the first defendant was serving a term of imprisonment for a crime that is not in any way connected to the present suit. More
