This is an appeal and cross appeal of the determination which was issued by the Designated Agent in a labour dispute between the appellant employer and the respondent employees. More
[1]I have before me an opposed application for a declaratur and consequential relief filed in terms of s14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06]. The applicant seeks the following order:-
1.The application for a declaratur be and is hereby granted.
2.It is declared that the respondent is not a statutory tenant of the applicant and enjoys no statutory protection under the Commercial Premises (Rent) Regulations, 1983.
Consequently
3. The respondent, and all those claiming occupation through it, be and are hereby ejected from a certain commercial premises being shops 10 and 11 Kensington Centre, Kensington, Harare.
4.The respondent shall... More
1. This is an application for condonation and reinstatement of appeal. The application is brought in terms of r 70 (2) of the Supreme Court Rules 2018. If successful, the applicant intends to appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court under case number HCH 4750/11. The judgment was handed down on 12 February 2024 under judgment number HH 64/24. More
This matter follows upon the issue of a consolidation order by this Court. As a result, the appeals by appellant and 2nd respondent against the arbitral award issued by 1st respondent were heard as one matter. The following is the judgment in the both matters. More
This matter follows upon the issue of a consolidation order by this Court. As a result, the appeals by appellant and 2nd respondent against the arbitral award issued by 1st respondent were heard as one matter. The following is the judgment in the both matters More
Applicant applied to this Court for leave to appeal its judgement to the Supreme Court. The application was made in terms of Section 92F of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01, hereafter called the Act, as read with Rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017, Respondent opposed the application. More
WAMAMBO J: This is an appeal against the judgment of the Magistrates Court. At the hearing we upheld the point in limine raised.
It is now our understanding that an appeal has been lodged in the Supreme Court. There is however, no request for full reasons in the IECMS System. Our attention was brought for the full reasons to be availed by the Registrar’s Office.
The reasons behind the decision we arrived at now follow.
The respondent as the plaintiff in the court a quo issued summons against the appellant (who was the defendant in the court a quo).
The... More
