This is an appeal from a determination made by an arbitrator. The following are the grounds of appeal and I quote:
‘1. The arbitrator misdirected herself on a question of law by failing to determine the application for recusal that had been made before her prior to the hearing of the arbitration on the merits.
2. The arbitrator erred at law in failing to find that she had no jurisdiction to adjudicate over the 2nd respondent’s claim as provided for by Section 63(3a) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01, despite the fact that he admittedly stated in his submissions that... More
The applicant approached this court for the relief of a declaratur. The relief sought is couched in the draft order as follows:
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: -
1. Stand number 145 on the Remaining Extent of Saturday Retreat Farm, be and is hereby declared to belong to the Applicant.
2. The 2nd Respondent be and is hereby ordered to pay costs of this Application on an Attorney-Client Scale.” More
The plaintiff seeks to recover from the two defendants, jointly or severally, the sum of US$50 000 being damages for malicious prosecution. He claims that the defendants maliciously set in motion a process that led to his arrest on allegations of fraud and his subsequent prosecution in the magistrates Court. He alleges in his declaration that the first defendant made the report of fraud against him to the police while fully knowing that there was no probable cause for doing so nor did he entertain any reasonable belief in the truthfulness of the information which he supplied to the police. More
This matter is a court application wherein applicant seeks the cancellation of title deeds. The relief sought by the applicant is couched in the following More
This is an appeal against an arbitral decision by arbitrator Honourable Chenyika made on 27 May 2024 where he ruled that: -
(i) “Claimants be immediately reinstated to their position as plant operators.
(ii) Claimants as plant operators be placed back onto the grade 11 scale of the NEC Mining Industry Job evaluation system without loss of salary and benefits with effect from 01 July 2020.
(iii) The parties, claimants as represented by ZDAMWU and the respondent are to meet within 14 days of receiving this award, to quantify the financial prejudice suffered by claimants as a result of implementation... More
The applicants approached this court seeking an order couched in the following manner:
“1. The 1st Respondent be and is hereby compelled to allow the Applicant access to inspect and make copies of all the documents contained within the files of the mining claims: More
This is an opposed chamber application for condonation for non-compliance with rr 55(5) and 70(2) and for reinstatement of an appeal deemed dismissed in terms of r 70 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018. More
