This is an application for quantification of damages in lieu of reinstatement. Applicant was employed by the Respondent. Allegations of misconduct were levelled against leading to his conviction and subsequent dismissal from employment. He approached this Court on appeal but the appeal was dismissed. Applicant appealed to the Supreme Court and the decision of this Court was set aside with the Supreme Court issuing the following Order: More
On the 23rd September 2024 at Harare, Arbitrator B Mudiwa issued an award wherein he dismissed appellant’s claim of unlawful termination of employment by respondent. Appellant then appealed the award to this Court in terms of Section 98(10) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an opposed application for a declarator aimed at determining the Applicant’s entitlement to a proper grade classification relating to his work position as an internal auditor. More
Appellant appealed to this Court against a determination made by the Designated Agent of the NEC for the Funeral Industry. The appeal was made in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 hereafter called the Act. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
On 11th December 2023 at Harare, Designated Agent A Chimedza issued a determination. He ordered appellant to reinstate respondent or pay him damages in lieu of reinstatement. Appellant then appealed the determination to this Court. The appeal was made in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01(hereafter called the Act). Respondent opposed the appeal. More
Applicant settled an invoice for the first term 2024 tuition fees for his minor child at Goldridge Primary School in full at the prevailing Reserve Bank inter Bank rate on the date of payment. The 1st to 4th respondents have opposed the application on the basis that the application is fatally defective and further that tuition fees for the minor child have not been settled in full based on an alleged contract entered into between 1st and 2nd respondents and as such, application must fail. More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of the termination of his employment contract by Respondents. The application was made in terms of Section 89 (1) 1 d of the Labour More
