This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision of this court rendered on 4th December 2020 under judgement reference LC/H/296/20. The application is premised on section 92F (2) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] as read with rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. The application is opposed. More
Appellant was employed by the Respondent at its Mutawatawa District Hospital. Allegations of misconduct were levelled against him and he was brought before a Disciplinary Committee. He was found guilty on two charges and Not Guilty on the other two. One of the charges was withdrawn during the course of the hearing. Appellant is dissatisfied with this outcome and has approached this Court for relief. Appellant’s grounds of appeal . More
This is an appeal against the determination of the Designated Agent of the NEC for the Mining Industry, which determination is dated 30th of August, 2023. The appeal is opposed.
The material background facts to the matter are as follows. The 1st to 9th Respondents were all employed by the Appellant. They were engaged in various work underground and in other areas linked to production underground. They were engaged on the basis of monthly fixed term contracts. They had served for periods ranging for at least a year and above. They were terminated upon effluxion of time of their last... More
: In the early hours of Sunday 6 October, 2019, at approximately the hour of 0545 two buses of the Yutong make collided head on along the A5 Highway at the 234 Kilometer peg. The A5 Highway is the road from Harare to Bulawayo or the vice versa direction. The 234 kilometre peg is located between Kwekwe and Gweru. The accident can only be described as tragic and horrific. It marked a sad day for the country which lost thirteen of its citizens from injuries sustained due to the accident. Scores of surviving passengers were injured to various degrees. The... More
Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondents. The appeal was made in terms of Section 51(1) of the Public Service Regulations S.I. 1 of 2000. Respondents opposed the appeal. More
: This is an urgent chamber application wherein applicant seeks stay of executor.
The facts as given in the founding affidavit are as follows:
On 30 November 2011 first responded issued summons against the applicant for malicious prosecution malicious arrest and detention for USD 400 000 plus interest.
The matter was set down for trial in the course of the trial an application for absolution from the instance was made and it was granted in favour of the applicant. First respondent appealed that judgment to the Supreme Court. Under SC 51/19 the Supreme Court rendered a judgment in favour of... More
: This matter was placed before me as an urgent chamber application.
The applicants seek an order as couched below:-
“TERMS OF THE FINAL RELIEF
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
The Provisional order be and is hereby confirmed.
The respondent shall pay applicants’ cost of suit on the legal practitioner and client scale More
