Applicant applied to this Court for “a review of the decision/action of the 1st Respondent” regarding the negotiation process of the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The application
1
was made in terms of Section 89(1) 1d of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. 1st Respondent opposed the application whilst 2nd Respondent did not file any response. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the Registrar of Labour, 1st Respondent herein. There was no appearance on behalf of the 1st respondent. The 2nd respondent opposes the appeal.
The background to this matter is that the 2nd respondent operates retail outlets. It has a number of branches. In some of its branches it operates bakeries.2nd respondent as an entity is registered with the National Employment Council for Commercial Sectors of Zimbabwe (NECCSZ). However, its instore bakeries were registered with the appellant. This was
This is an appeal against the decision of the Registrar of Labour, 1st Respondent... More
The Applicant seeks in this application to have reviewed the decision by the 1st and 2nd Respondents, jointly or one of them with the approval of the other to approve an investigator to investigate the affairs of the Applicant contrary to the provisions of Section 63 and Section 63A of the Labour Act [CAP 28:01] and without any other legal basis whatsoever. The 1st and 2nd Respondent announced the appointment of the investigator in a letter dated 22 January 2024 (attached as Annexure 4 to Applicant’s papers). There is attached to this letter a letter containing a complaint addressed to... More
This is a composite urgent chamber application for stay of execution and correction of a court order granted in error in terms of Rule 29(1)(a)(b) of the High Court Rules, 2021. More
On 27 May 2025 Applicants filed an urgent application in this Court for a provisional order directing respondent to cease or desist from “committing any unfair labour practices against Applicant’s members.”
The application was made in terms of Section 89(c) (vii) of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01 as read with Rule 18 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondents opposed the application. More
ZHOU J: This is an application for a declaratory order and consequential relief made in terms of s14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06] in which the applicant seeks an order couched in the following terms:
1. That the agreement of sale of 2000 gold dumps entered by applicant and first respondent on 29 October 2024 is valid, subsisting and obligating on the parties.
2. That in terms of that agreement, applicant is entitled to access and collect 1384 loads of gold dump from first respondent. More
The delay in the hand down of this judgement is sincerely regretted. On the 24th of July, 2024 this court issued an order to the following effect;
“1. Ground of appeal number 5 is struck off. 2. The appeal is dismissed with costs.
3. The judgement is to follow.”
The following constitutes the reasons for the order as granted. More
