On 13 February 2025 this court handed down an order granting the review application with costs on the ordinary scale. It ordered further that the proceedings leading to the applicant’s dismissal be set aside and in their place the matter be determined afresh before a different hearing officer. More
Applicant applied to this Court for the reinstatement of his appeal (LC/H/984/24) which was deemed as abandoned and dismissed. The application was made in terms of Rule 46 of the Labour Court rules, 2017. Respondent opposed the application. More
This case is an urgent chamber application wherein the applicant seeks an interdict against the respondent enjoining it from taking possession of the machinery located at applicant’s premises at No. 65 VA Great Riversdale Farm Ward 22, Mazowe. The relief is sought to ensure the preservation of the subject machinery as security for the determination and recovery of applicant’s legal entitlements, including compensation for the respondent’s breach of the agreement between the parties. More
The applicant is the 1st respondent’s father. It is never easy for a father to drag his son to courts; this is just evidence of a broken family. Something must have gone seriously wrong. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are cited as nominal respondents by virtue of their offices for purposes of enforcement of the court order. The applicant seeks an order to revoke a donation he made to the 1st respondent, his son and costs of suit on a higher scale against the 1st respondent only.
[3] The applicant purchased stand number 30463 Rifle Range Chegutu (the property) from... More
The appellant appealed against the whole judgment of the Magistrate Court sitting in Harare. The Respondent cross appealed against parts of the same judgment. More
(1) This is a court application for a declaratory order brought in terms of s14 of the High Court Act, Chapter [7:06]. The relief sought is couched in the following terms;
“1. It is hereby declared that the applicant has paid the 1st respondent full purchase price for an undivided share of 0.39% of Coyant Investments (Private) Limited, translating to 0,39% of Stand 12923 in Madokero Estate coupled with an exclusive right of occupation of Flat 37C on the immovable property. More
This matter is a civil action wherein the parties drew up a statement of agreed facts at the Pre-Trial Conference stage such that it became a stated case. All the facts are therefore common cause. It is the applicable law that is contentious. The brief background of the case is that sometime in 2014, plaintiff, which is a company incorporated in Germany, sold seven buses to the defendant which is a local company and such buses were delivered to the defendant as agreed. The purchase price for each bus was agreed at US$84 143, 28. It is agreed that the... More
