This is an application for review, brought in terms of rule 20(1) of the Labour Court Rules, 2017 (Hereinafter the Rules). The following background facts provide the context for this application. More
This is an appeal against the entire decision of the Supreme Court which held that the immovable property called Umguza Agricultural Lots of Umvutcha and Reigate, being gazetted land, belonged to the State. It went on to make a finding that the courts’ jurisdiction relating to the acquisition of the land was ousted by s 16B of the former Constitution. This is an appeal with leave granted on 11 June 2024 in the case of Fletcher v Minister of Lands & Ors CCZ 07-24. More
: This is an application for an interdict against the 1st respondent. The basis for this application is that the 1st applicant is the registered holder of mining claims, known as the ROYAL FAMILY GROUP MINING CLAIMS. The 1st respondent allegedly conducts mining activities independently on the 1st applicant’s mining claims. He holds no certificate of registration in respect of those claims but the 1st applicant does. He is not a director, shareholder, or employee of the applicants. The 1st respondent is the only one who has opposed this application. More
This is an application for quantification of damages. I should point out that the matter suffered several stillbirths when parties requested postponements to enable them reach an out-of-court settlement. Alas, this was not to be as the parties failed to agree on certain key issues. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of section 92F (2) of the Act and Rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. The application is unopposed as the Respondents did not file any responses after being served with the application.
BRIEF FACTS More
This appeal arises from a decision rendered by a Designated Agent (Hereinafter the D.A) for the National Employment Council for Lumber Milling, Timber Processing and Trading Industry in Zimbabwe in two separate but similar matters relating to the dismissal of the first and second respondents respectively. More
On 14 March 2025 Applicant applied to this Court for the reinstatement of the abandoned and dismissed matter LCH 87/25. This application was made in terms of Rule 46 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017. Respondent opposed the application.
The founding affidavit by applicant’s attorney stated that; “4. On the 3rd of February 2025, Applicant filed a Chamber Application in this honorable court for Condonation for late noting of Review. Find attached hereto a copy of the Application marked Annexture A. The Respondent filed its Notice of Opposition on the
1
17th of February 2025. (Find attached Annexture B). Applicant... More
