On 14 January 2025 this court handed down an order by consent where the parties hoped to settle their matter out of court. The out of court settlement failed, resulting in the matter being re-enrolled for 24 January 2025. On 24 January 2025 the matter which was an appeal at the instance of the employer was heard leading to this judgement. A point in limine vis the propriety of the appeal was raised but failed due to lack of foundation. The point therefore does not form part of this judgement. More
1.Application be and is hereby granted.
2.The Respondents are hereby ordered to release the Applicant’s motor vehicle namely, a Toyota Hilux with Registration Number AGP3852. More
The plaintiff and the defendant married each other on 16 April 2023 under the then Marriage Act [Chapter 5:11] now the Marriages Act [Chapter 5:17]. The marriage still subsists. The marriage was blessed with two minor children namely Anotidaishe Chimkwasu born on 11 December 2012 and Anesuishe Chimkwasu born on 20 January 2020. On 26 April 2023 the plaintiff sued out summons for divorce and ancillary relief. In her declaration, she stated that the marriage relationship between the parties had irretrievably broken down to such an extent that there are no reasonable prospects of restoration of a normal marriage relationship... More
On 13 February 2025 this court handed down an order granting the review application with costs on the ordinary scale. It ordered further that the proceedings leading to the applicant’s dismissal be set aside and in their place the matter be determined afresh before a different hearing officer. More
Applicant applied to this Court for the reinstatement of his appeal (LC/H/984/24) which was deemed as abandoned and dismissed. The application was made in terms of Rule 46 of the Labour Court rules, 2017. Respondent opposed the application. More
This case is an urgent chamber application wherein the applicant seeks an interdict against the respondent enjoining it from taking possession of the machinery located at applicant’s premises at No. 65 VA Great Riversdale Farm Ward 22, Mazowe. The relief is sought to ensure the preservation of the subject machinery as security for the determination and recovery of applicant’s legal entitlements, including compensation for the respondent’s breach of the agreement between the parties. More
The applicant is the 1st respondent’s father. It is never easy for a father to drag his son to courts; this is just evidence of a broken family. Something must have gone seriously wrong. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are cited as nominal respondents by virtue of their offices for purposes of enforcement of the court order. The applicant seeks an order to revoke a donation he made to the 1st respondent, his son and costs of suit on a higher scale against the 1st respondent only.
[3] The applicant purchased stand number 30463 Rifle Range Chegutu (the property) from... More
