This is a judgment on a preliminary point raised on behalf of the applicant in an application for review.
The facts are common cause. They are as follows. The applicant filed the application for review and duly served the respondent. The respondent was supposed to have filed the notice of opposition within ten (10) days of receipt of the application, that is to say, by the 31st of March 2025. It did not do so . Instead it filed the notice on the 4th of April 2025. This was obviously out of time. There was no application for condonation for... More
This is a judgment on a preliminary point raised on behalf of the applicant in an application
for review.
The facts are common cause. They are as follows. The applicant filed the application for
review and duly served the respondent. The respondent was supposed to have filed the notice
of opposition within ten (10) days of receipt of the application, that is to say, by the 31st of
March 2025. It did not do so . Instead it filed the notice on the 4th of April 2025. This was
obviously out of time. There was no application for condonat More
[1]This is an application for, inter alia, a declaratur and an interdict. The relief sought is couched as follows:
i.That the first and second respondents together with any persons acting or purporting to act on their behalf and / or acting in common purpose with them be and are hereby interdicted from proceeding with the construction of the Glaudina and Kuwadzana Extension Junction along Bulawayo Road based on the Draft Plan Number TPY/WR/1/24. More
DUBE J: This is an application for contempt of court. The 3rd Respondent did not file any Notice of Opposition. 5th Respondent being cited nominee officio also did not file any opposition, meaning they choose to abide by the outcome whichever way. The 4th Respondent filed a consent to the prayer being sought by the Applicant. More
On 10 April 2025, after hearing oral arguments from the parties’ legal practitioners, the court reserved judgment sine die. The applicant approached the court seeking a review of the first respondent’s decision made on 29 August 2024 on the grounds that the decision was irrational, unfair and motivated by malice and bias. The applicant seeks an order that the resolution by the first respondent to look for alternative land that is not depicted on layout plan TPX/WR/11/15 and TPX/WR/11/15/1 for applicant’s members be set aside; that the first respondent be ordered to finalise its processes in the allocation of residential... More
This is an application for a Caveat or for the placement of the following. Immovable property registered in favour of the first respondent under judicial attachment; a certain piece of land situate in the district of Salisbury, called Stand 173 Willowvale Township of Willovale measuring 7438 square metres, held under Deed of Transfer No 6366/88 (the property). More
This is an application for condonation of the late filing of an application for Review. The facts, which are common cause are that the Second Respondent rendered a determination which served on the Applicant on 5 June 2024. In terms of the Rules, Applicant was supposed to the application for Review within 21 days. This was not done. Applicant has therefore approached this Court for condonation. More
