(1) This is a court application for a declaratory order brought in terms of s14 of the High Court Act, Chapter [7:06]. The relief sought is couched in the following terms;
“1. It is hereby declared that the applicant has paid the 1st respondent full purchase price for an undivided share of 0.39% of Coyant Investments (Private) Limited, translating to 0,39% of Stand 12923 in Madokero Estate coupled with an exclusive right of occupation of Flat 37C on the immovable property. More
This matter is a civil action wherein the parties drew up a statement of agreed facts at the Pre-Trial Conference stage such that it became a stated case. All the facts are therefore common cause. It is the applicable law that is contentious. The brief background of the case is that sometime in 2014, plaintiff, which is a company incorporated in Germany, sold seven buses to the defendant which is a local company and such buses were delivered to the defendant as agreed. The purchase price for each bus was agreed at US$84 143, 28. It is agreed that the... More
Applicant applied to this Court for the review of his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The application was made in terms of Section 89(1)d1 of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01.
The Respondent’s papers raise 3(three) points in limine which shall be dealt with first ad seriatim.
A.That the application for review was filed out of time:
This point was abandoned by respondent at the onset of oral argumen More
The applicant is a company duly incorporated in terms of the Companies and Other Businesses Act [Chapter 24:31]. The first respondent is an administrative authority responsible for the collection of taxes and is established in terms of the Revenue Authority Act [Chapter 23:11] (“the Revenue Authority Act”). The applicant was placed under corporate rescue in terms of the Insolvency Act [Chapter 6:07] and as a consequence, its affairs fall entirely under the administration of a Corporate Rescue Practitioner (CRP). More
This application for summary judgment, which on the face of it, is based on an instalment sale agreement between the applicant and first respondent over property house stand number, 978 Wattle Close, West View, Kadoma, also known as number 978, of 960 Gatooma Township, Gatooma. More
The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming a total of USD32 861.00 (Thirty – two Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty – One United States Dollars), being an amount arising from personal loans advanced to the defendant in August 2017 and June 2019, plus interest at the prescribed rate from the due date of payment to the date of final payment.
The plaintiff seeks an order compelling the defendant to settle the loan obligation in United States dollars (USD), arguing that the loan was a foreign obligation not affected by the provisions of Statutory Instrument 33 of 2019 (“SI 33/19”)... More
On 15 May 2025 this court dismissed with costs on the ordinary scale an appeal which had been filed by the appellant employee in a decision which saw him being dismissed by the respondent employer on allegations of misconduct. On the same date the respondent employer applied orally to the court that the appeal proceedings be stayed until such time as appellant would have paid costs under previous bills. More
