I disallowed defendant`s objection to the production of a document during trial and gave reasons ex tempore. I furnish, at defendant`s request, the written reasons.
[2] The parties in the main matter are shareholders and directors in fourth defendant. They are currently involved in a dispute over ownership and control of that entity.
THE OBJECTION More
The applicant, who has been a self-representing litigant since the inception of the labour dispute between the parties eleven years ago, was employed by the second respondent, a company under corporate rescue under the stewardship of the first respondent as its corporate rescue practitioner, as a branch accountant on 1 July 2012. More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an appeal and extension of time within which to file the appeal. The background of the matter is that applicant who was in the respondent’s employment as a National Training Centre Manager was brought before a disciplinary committee on allegations that he had sexually abused 2 of his subordinates who were female trainers with the respondent. More
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of section 92 F (2) of the Labour Act (Chapter 28:01) and Rule 43 of the Labour Court Rules, 2017.
On 17 October 2024, this Court rendered an Ex Tempore Decision in whichApplicant’s matter was struck off the roll for being improperly before the Court. Applicant is dissatisfied with that decision and intends to approach the Supreme Court for relief. I make the observation that despite the Ex Tempore Decision being just a page long, Applicant has filed submissions in a document encompassing some nineteen (19)... More
On 3 June 2025 this Court handed down order LCH ORD 405/25 which ordered the following:
“Matter be and is hereby struck off the roll for the reason that it is improperly before the court. Each party bears own costs.”
On 4 June 2025, the applicant by letter addressed to the Registrar formally requested for reasons for the order of 3 June 2025. They are they: -
The background to the matter is that the applicant employee filed an application with this Court under Section 89(2)(c) of the Labour Act where he sought the following relief: More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an appeal against the decision of the DA who ruled that there was nothing for him to determine if regard is had to the fact that the employer had paid the employee all that was due to him and that the Unionist had collected such dues for onward transmission to the applicant More
This was an application for review. The facts in brief are that Applicant was employed by the Respondent as a Loss Control Officer based in Mutare. Sometime in February 2022, allegations of misconduct were leveled against him leading to charges being preferred against him. He was brought before a Disci0linary Committee which found him guilty and recommended his dismissal from employment. On 31st March 2022, Applicant filed his appeal with the Appeals Officer in terms of the Respondent’s Code of Conduct. The Appeals Committee only made its determination available on 24th January 2025. Applicant is disgruntled by this outcome. In... More
