The applicants were employed by the respondent in different capacities. Following allegations that they committed offences they were charged and subsequently dismissed. The process was punctuated with numerous applications. The applicants then noted an appeal against the arbitrator’s decision dismissing them from employment on 11 June 2013. The respondent filed its Notice of Response on 28 June 2013. The applicants who were duly represented by a legal practitioner did not file the heads of argument within 14 days of receiving the Notice of Response as required in terms of the rules. More
Applicants and Respondent are embroiled in litigation before this Court. Applicants filed this application for Interim Relief wherein they seek a stay of the arbitral award by Arbitrator A.J. Manase pending the determination of the appeal. More
The applicant is the director of two duly registered real estate companies, Pride Real Estate and Ascent Real Estate. He is alleged to have fraudulently sold a residential stand in Mount Pleasant Heights for US$15 000-00 sometime in 2007 and converted the proceeds to his own use.
Investigations revealed that the applicant has a similar pending case under CRB 4634/11. He is also facing an additional charge of fraudulently faking his qualifications to gain registration as an estate agent.
The presiding magistrate denied the applicant bail on the basis that he has a propensity of committing fraud and therefore was... More
The plaintiff was the owner of stand 8140 Victoria Falls Township and title to the property was held under title deed number 1816/2014. As Town Clerk for Victoria Falls Municipality he was offered stand 1537 Victoria Falls Township Lands as part of his conditions of service. He therefore ‘owned’ two properties in Victoria Falls. More
This is an application for bail pending trial. Applicant is facing a charge of unlawful possession of pangolin scales in contravention of section 45(1) of the Parks and Wildlife Act as read with section 128 of the Parks and Wildlife Act (Chapter 20:14). Applicant denies the allegations. The application is opposed. More
KABASA J: On 1st September 2016 the plaintiff entered into three agreements with the defendant. The first agreement related to the sale of the plaintiff’s property, whose full description is stand 8140 Victoria Falls Township of Victoria Falls Township Lands. This property is held under title deed number 1816/2014. The second agreement related to a deed of cession and assignment of stand 1537 Victoria Falls Township measuring 5, 195m2, which stand had been offered to the plaintiff by virtue of his position as Town Clerk of the Victoria Falls Town Council. The third agreement related to the construction of town... More
The plaintiff is a former employee of the defendant. The defendant is a duly incorporated company in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe.
The plaintiff was employed by defendant from 1990 to 2006. He was employed as a Cibra Machine Operator. Later he was assigned to work as an Assistant Tapeline 11 Machine Operator. More
The first applicant and the second respondent have a long standing dispute between them. The dispute centres on the control and ownership of the second applicant. Each one of them claims that it is a director of the second applicant. More
This is an application for summary judgment for the eviction of the respondent and any other person claiming occupation or use through him, together with their goods, possessions and chatels from the premises known as sub-division 4 of “Fresnaye” situate in the District of Umzingwane, also known as plot 4 Worringham, Umguza being an immovable property that the applicants own and that the respondent occupied at the applicants’ benevolence which benevolence defendant has spurned. More
The bare bones of the dispute in this appeal are these: The appellant and the first respondent entered into a lease agreement for premises situate at 26 East Road, Belgravia, Harare on 16 May, 2003. On 14 March, 2008, the first respondent, following its cancellation of the lease agreement, obtained an order in the Magistrates’ court under case number MC 1701/07. The contentious order was couched in these words: More
The applicant is a businessman and commercial farmer. He also holds the post of Minister of Finance. He has been remanded in custody since 26 April 2004, pending his trial on four counts of contravening section 5 of the Exchange Control Act [Chapter 22:05] and one count of contravening section 21 of the Citizenship Act [Chapter 4:01]. More
1 The applicant and 17 other employees of the City of Harare were suspended from duty on 24 June 1999, following the findings of a committee of inquiry duly set up by the Minister of Local Government and National Housing (“the Minister”), in terms of the Urban Councils Act [Chapter 29.15], (‘the Act”).
2 At the time of the suspension of the applicant and the other employees, the affairs of the City were under the management of a Commission headed by one Elijah Chanakira, and appointed by the Minister on 8 March 1999 in terms of section 80 of the... More
On 25th November 2011 Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The appeal raised both procedural and substantive issues More
This court has been asked by the applicant to review the decision of the respondent of the 14th of October 2022, stamped on the 30th of November, 2022, on the basis of gross irregularity and unreasonableness as well as illegality. The application has been brought in terms of s27 of the High court Act [Chapter, 7:06] as read with s4 of the Administrative of Justice Act [Chapter 10:28]. It is contested. More
The applicant seeks an order compelling the respondent to comply with the determination rendered by a designation agent on the 29th of November 2021. In that determination the respondent was ordered to convene disciplinary proceedings against the applicant within seven days and conclude the same within the period stipulated in SI 175/2012. More
