In this urgent chamber application the applicant seeks a provisional order in the following terms:
“1. TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
1.1. The provisional order be and is hereby confirmed
1.2. That the respondent shall pay costs of suit.
2. INTERIM RELIEF GRANTED
A “Mandament van spolie” be and is hereby granted restoring the “status quo ante” which prevailed prior to the 1st October 2010 to the respondent’s occupation of a piece of land known as Elsinora, situate in the district of Mazowe, and that such restoration be achieved by the eviction of the respondent, his possessions and all persons... More
This is an application for bail pending appeal. The brief facts are that applicant was charged and convicted of contravening s 70 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Cap 9:23] and was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment after the court a quo found him to be infected with the HIV virus. The applicant noted an appeal against conviction and sentence. At the bail hearing applicant correctly abandoned the appeal against sentence. More
On the 8th of January, 2014, through his erstwhile legal practitioner, Appellant filed an appeal with this Court. The grounds of appeal can be gleaned from pages 5 – 7 of the record. These are that:-
1. Respondent misdirected itself of a point of law and on the facts in finding that Appellant was guilty of misconduct and that he was lawfully dismissed as
1.1. Appellant was not given sufficient particulars of the charges.
1.2. The Disciplinary Committee violated the Interfresh Limited Code of Conduct as well as the rules of natural justice in that he was not afforded an... More
Sometime in April 2021 Caleb Chihwa was arrested driving a truck loaded with 294 bales of second-hand clothes which had been smuggled into Zimbabwe. He was travelling from Mutare to Harare. The subject truck was not registered with the Central Vehicle Registry, applicant claims that it belongs to her. On 23 November 2022 Caleb Chihwa was prosecuted and fined. Meanwhile on 15 July 2021 a Notice of Seizure of the truck was issued by the Regional Manager and applicant was informed. Various representations were made from the station manager upwards in an effort to set aside the seizure and release... More
On 3 April 2006 the appellant was found guilty of one count of contravening s 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act [Chapter 9:16] (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Magistrates Court. On 9 February 2013, the High Court confirmed the conviction and found that there was no appeal against sentence before it. The appellant now appeals to this Court against both conviction and sentence. More
The Applicant approached this court by way of court application seeking a declaratory order in terms of Section 14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06].The applicant’s draft order reads as follows:
“1. An application for Declaratory Order be and is hereby granted in favour of the Applicant in the following terms;
(a) Applicant be and is hereby declared the lawful holder of rights, title and interest in property known as stand number 6401 Retreat Waterfalls.
(b) Firstrespondent and all those in occupation through her at property known as No. 6412 Retreat waterfalls be and hereby are ordered to forthwith... More
The appellant was employed by the Judicial Service Commission (the respondent) as a court interpreter. He was found guilty of an act of misconduct and he was dismissed. This is his appeal against his conviction and penalty. More
The appellant was a magistrate stationed at Chinhoyi Provincial Magistrates Court, Mashonaland West. He was arraigned in that court on two counts of contravening s 3(1) (a) (ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, [Cap 9:16]and, after a contested trial, convicted. He was, on 3 April 2006, sentenced to undergo thirty six months imprisonment of which twelve months were suspended on condition of future good behavior. He was represented by counsel of his choice throughout his trial. After sentence was pronounced, he noted an appeal against both conviction and sentence on 11 April 2006. AdvocateMatinenga prepared appellant’s heads of argument... More
In August, 2011, the Appellant was charged with violating sub sections 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 10 of Section A and sub Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Section B of the (IT) User Agreement which provided that company technologies were provided and reserved for the company’s business only in that he sent insulting personal messages to his subordinate; one Neverrest Simango.
The second charge was for contravening the Tobacco Industry Code of Conduct in that he displayed indiscipline, violence and other related offences by using insulting or abusive language and the third charge was for dishonest, theft, fraud... More
This is an application for bail pending appeal. The applicant was convicted of contravening s 3 (1) of the Precious Stones Trade Act [Chapter 21:06]. More
This is an application for bail being appeal.
The applicant was convicted of two counts by the Magistrate sitting at Chiredzi on 14 December, 2020.
In count 1 which relates to contravening s 59(2)(b) of the Parks and Wildlife, Act [Cap20:14] the 26 year old applicant was sentenced to pay a fine of $1000 or in default of payment to serve 5 months imprisonment.
In count 2 which relates to contravening s 80(1) of SI 362/90 as read with s 128(b) of the Parks and Wild Life, Act [Cap 20:14] the applicant was sentenced to the minimum mandatory sentence of... More
This is an appeal against a decision made by the Minister of Labour and Social Services who had been cited as the 2nd respondent in these proceedings. More
The matter was placed before me as an urgent chamber application for an interdict. In the order handed down on 21st June, 2011 the court granted the interdict as sought. The respondent then sought for leave from this court to appeal to the Supreme Court. More
MAKONESE J: This is an application for rescission of judgment and application for stay of execution. I have combined the two applications for convenience. They concern the same parties and the circumstances arise from the same subject matter. The application is opposed by the respondents. The 12 respondents nominated one Bishop Phakathi to represent them all. More
DUBE-BANDA J:This is a court application for a declaratur. Applicant seeks a declaratory relief couched in the following terms:
It is ordered that:
a. The sale of applicant’s bus by the 1st respondent pursuant to the court order under cover of case number HC 2576/18, obtained by the 2nd respondent under a sale conducted by the 3rd respondent be and is hereby set aside.
b. Alternatively, to order in paragraph (a) above it be and is hereby declared that the sale of the applicant’s bus is and was a legal nullity.
c. The applicant be and is hereby granted the... More
