This is an appeal against the decision of the 1st respondent’s Disciplinary Authority.
In its notice of response to the appeal, 1st respondent raised and persisted with a preliminary point to the effect that 1st respondentwas improperly cited. The Minister and not the Ministry should have been cited as required under Section 3 of the State Liabilities Act [Chapter 8:14]. By citing the Ministry, appellant made a fundamental error which cannot be remedied. The Ministry is too broad which makes it impossible to be sued, so argued the respondent. More
This is a consolidated appeal of LC/H/293/2012 and LC/H/296/2012 against the decisions of the respondent works council appeal body which confirmed the appellants’ dismissal in cases where the appellants allegedly stole eleven layer boards in contravention of the respondent Code of Conduct.
Facts of the case are that the appellants who were in the respondent’s employ as loader and truck assistant respectively were on 4 December 2011 charged with the responsibility of loading a beverage truck destined for Nyameni. When the truck which they had loaded was intercepted by the respondent’s other employees it was discovered that eleven extra boards... More
MAKONI JA: This is an opposed application for leave to appeal made in terms of s 44 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06] as read with r20 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018.
The applicant was convicted of rape and sentenced to an effective 10 years imprisonment by the Harare Regional Court on 11 July 2016. His appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed by the High Court on 29 May 2019. He sought leave to appeal to this Court, against the dismissal of his appeal, before the High court which leave was declined on 10 December 2020... More
This is an appeal against the arbitral award by Honourable G Kwaramba that was handed down on 12 December 2014. The award is couched as follows
“Wherefore after going through submissions filed of record by parties, the claimant’s case is do and hereby considered regarding overtime. The respondent is ordered to negotiate overtime within 7 days with the claimants, failure of which either party to approach this tribunal for quantification.”
The brief facts of the matter are that the contracts of termination of employment filed of record indicate that the respondents were employed as security guards by CCC. More
The appellants were convicted of three counts of culpable homicide as defined in s 49 of the Criminal Law (Codification & Reform) Act, [Cap 9:23]. They were sentenced to 15 months imprisonment of which 5 months were suspended on conditions of good behaviour and a further 10 months were suspended on condition that the appellants performed 350 hours of community service. Aggrieved by their conviction and sentence, they now appeal to this court against both. More
At the commencement of this matter, both parties applied to have supplementary affidavits admitted. Neither counsel objecting to the admissions, both were admitted by consent More
This is an application for the setting aside of the decision of the Sheriff of Zimbabwe, the Sheriff, to confirm a sale in execution in respect of the Remainder of Lot 330 Block B Hatfield of Hatfield Estate otherwise known as number 6 Wenlock Road, Hatfield,Harare .The application is brought in terms of Order 40 r 359(1) of the High Court Rules,1979. More
This is an opposed application for rescission of judgment made in terms of r 29(1)(a) of the High Court Rules, 2021. For convenience and where the context permits, the applicant shall be referred to as Mupamombe Housing Co-Operative Society Limited and the second respondent as Mupamombe Housing Project. More
This is an application for the confirmation of a ruling by the applicant in terms of Section 93 (5a) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] as amended. The application was set down for hearing on 27 October 2016 at 0900 hours. On the day of the hearing only Counsel for Applicant and 2nd Respondent turned up. Having perused the application, I decided to dispose of the matter on the record as some procedural issues arise. More
This is an appeal against the decision of the arbitrator who upheld the now Respondent’s claim of unfair dismissal by the Appellant Company.
The facts of the matter are that: The Respondent who had been in Appellant’s employ approached the labour officers with his claim of unfair dismissal by the Appellant Company, which matter ended up at arbitration. More
On the 30th April, 2016 the Arbitrator issued an award ordering Applicant to pay Respondent grade 4 salaries.
In the event of the parties failing to agree, the parties were to go back to the Arbitrator within 14 days for quantification.
Aggrieved by the award, Applicant noted an appeal to this court on the 19th May, 2016. More
This matter was set down for Mutare Circuit as an appeal at the instance of the appellant employer against a decision which was made in favour of the respondent employee by the arbitrator on 26 June 2015. More
The brief history of this matter is that – On the 10th of September 2004 Honourable arbitrator H. Muchinako made an arbitral award which was in the favour of the Respondent. He ordered that the Respondent should be reinstated with back pay from 2002 to the date of reinstatement without loss of salary and benefits. On the 30th of January 2005 the appellant reinstated the Respondent to his job but he did not pay him part of his salary arrears. The Respondent then applied for quantification in 2013. Meanwhile in 2010 the undertaking registered a Collective Bargaining Agreement More
In this matter the applicant is an aspiring Chief Madziva of Shamva who has approached the court on an urgent basis seeking the following relief:- More
