In this application, the applicant seeks a provisional order in the following terms;
“Terms of Final Order Sought
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why an order should not be granted in the following terms:
1. Respondent in fencing its cantonment area or operation shall not include the applicant’s land which was purchased from Kadoma Rural District Council which is also known as number 2 The Range until there’s an order from a competent court to do so.
2. Respondent to pay costs of suit at a higher scale. More
On the 1th August 2023 Respondent’s disciplinary authority issued a final written warning to Appellant. The warning is valid for 12(twelve) months, Appellant then appealed to this Court in terms of section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an urgent chamber application in which the applicant seeks an interim interdict against the first respondent and all its functionaries, that they be barred from interfering, interrupting, disturbing or hindering its activities, at Hunyani 30 Mine Hunyani Farm Mashonaland West. The final order sought is the confirmation of the interim interdict.
The founding affidavit was deposed to by a Mr John Mandere, a director and shareholder in the applicant, a company duly registered in accordance with the laws of Zimbabwe. The first respondent is a body corporate in terms of s 3 of the Chinhoyi University of Technology... More
On 8 January 2016 this court granted a provisional order in favour of the applicant in the following;
1. That the first respondent and all those claiming occupation through it, be and are hereby barred from interfering, interrupting, disturbing and hindering the use and possession by the applicant, of Hunyani 30 Mine Hunyani Farm, Mashonaland West, pending the return date. More
Applicants claimed that over the years, the executive committee in the form of 1st to 8th respondents have failed to adhere to the terms of the Constitution in that they have not presented any audited accounts, have not presented any budget for approval, have not presented any income and expenditure account notwithstanding the fact that they had received payment of royalties from hunting activities in the name and under the payment issued to the association by the Department of Parks and Wildlife. The executive committee in the meantime sought and obtained hunting permits at least twice before and for the... More
This is a court application in which the applicant seeks specific performance drawn in the following terms:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Within seven days from the date of service of this order by the Sheriff of Zimbabwe the respondent shall deliver 25 200, 50 kg bags of PC 15 cement, at the applicant’s address office No. 15 1st Floor Plumpton Chambers, Hebert Chitepo Street, Mutare, failure of which the Sheriff of Zimbabwe with or without the assistance of the Zimbabwe Republic Police and (sic) is hereby authorized to effect this order.
2. That the respondent shall pay costs of... More
This matter appeared before me on 9 October 2020. Mr N.Mlalaappeared for the applicant whilst Ms S. Mhlanga appeared for the 2nd and 3rd respondents.
After a brief hearing, the parties settled the matter and agreed that an order by consent be made, to the following effect.
1. That the Provisional Order is set aside as prayed for.
2. The applicant pay costs of suit on the ordinary scale.
Ms S. Mhlanga for the 2nd and 3rdrespondents who were the victors in the matter has asked for reasons for judgment regrading clause 2 of the order. More
The applicant was charged with the offence of theft. The facts of the case read like a movie. The allegations on which the applicant was placed on remand by the magistrate at Harare on 25 January 2021 were as follows. The narrative starts with one Shadreck Njowa. He is said to have been part of the gang of armed robbers that waylaid a ZB Bank cash in transit vehicle along Harare Chinhoyi road on 6 January 2021 at the 60 kilometre peg. The cash in transit vehicle was carrying a crew of bank representatives and security guards in addition to... More
On 19 May 2016 we dismissed the appellant’s appeal with costs. The appellant requested for reasons for judgment as early as 19 May 2016 but the request was not brought to our attention until 20 March 2017, this explains the delay. The reasons for our dismissal of the appeal are hereby furnished. More
The applicant’s claim is for a provisional order seeking repossession of, equipment and motor vehicles valued at US$1 558 068, 53 and US$96 000.00 respectively. Its cause of action is based on breach of contract on account of the first respondent’s failure to pay the purchase price for the property sold in terms of the agreement of sale. More
: The applicant is a limited liability foreign company incorporated in terms of the laws of Hong Kong whose address of service is No. 7 Livingstone Avenue, Milton Park Harare. Sometime in January 2010 it allegedly concluded an Equipment Sales Contract coupled with a Short Term Loan/Financing scheme with the first respondent. More
MABHIKWA J: The applicantand 6others attended interviews in a recruitment process conducted from September 2017 to May 2018. This was for the post of Assistant Director of Health Services (Environmental Health). Both the applicant and the 2nd respondent were already employed by the 1st respondent at the time in different capacities. At the end of the whole process, the 2nd respondent was appointed or elevated to the post of substantive Assistant Director of Health Services with effect from May 2018. More
Applicant and respondent are husband and wife. They were married to each other at Bulawayo on 30th July 2016 in terms of the Marriage Act (Chapter 5:11). The parties are going through an acrimonious divorce. At the centre of the dispute is the distribution of the immovable and movable assets of the matrimonial estate. The parties are living in separation. Applicant has approached this court on an urgent basis seeking an order for spoliation. The gist of the application is that he was in peaceful and undisturbed possession of a Toyota Hilux GD 6, double cab, white in colour, registration... More
This is an application for the review of proceedings conducted by the second respondent sitting at Gutu magistrates’ court on 22 January 2014. The application is made in terms of s 27 of the High Court Act [Chapter7:06]. The application was opposed, however at the hearing there was no appearance for the first respondent, there being a letter on record that the first respondent was to abide by the court’s ruling whilst the Civil Division did not appear on behalf of the second respondent.
The brief history of the matter is as follows: the first respondent was arraigned before a... More
