The plaintiffcompany in this matter issued summons against the defendant company and prayed for the following:
(a) An order confirming the cancellation ofagreement of lease between plaintiff and defendant in terms of which plaintiff leased to defendant the premises located on a portion of stand 391 Bulawayo Township, also known as Warehouse, Haddon & Sly Complex, Bulawayo.
(b) An order for the ejectment forthwith of the defendant and all its subtenants, assignees, invitees, and all those claiming occupation through defendant from plaintiff’s premises.
(c) Payment in the sum of US$33 950,00 being arrear rent as at 31 August 2016, together... More
Applicant is a real estate firm and respondent its former client. Applicant seeks an order for specific performance directing respondent to pay an amount of US$ 20,037,50 being the sum allegedly due under a realtor`s mandate. Respondent contests the relief sought on the basis that applicant failed to deliver on that mandate. More
The plaintiff is claiming US$201 250 as commission for facilitating the sale of stand 1824 Ardbennie Township, interest on the said sum plus costs of suit. At the close of the plaintiff’s case the defendant applied for absolution from the instance. More
Applicant applied to this Court for condonation of a late appeal in terms of Rule 22 of the Labour Court Rules S.I. 150.17. Respondent opposed the application. More
1. That the Notice of Response is fatally defective for want of form:
Rule 19(2) of the Labour Court Rules, 2017 requires a party to file his response in the prescribed form called LC2. Appellant alleged that the Response in casu does not comply with the requirement. A comparison of the response and Form LC 2 shows that the only difference is absence of the inscription “LC2” at the top right corner. The inscription is meant to identify the forms in the Rules.
It is not necessary that a party’s response in their pleadings be inscribed by the Form’s notation.... More
This is a ss79 and 80 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24] (“the Money Laundering Act”) application for the civil forfeiture to the State of ZWL$1436 500 and a white Honda Airwave Registration number AFD 1898 (“the motor vehicle) More
This is a chamber application for reinstatement of an application for leave to appeal and condonation for late filing of documents. When the applicant filed his chamber application for leave to appeal he had over looked the need to file the charge sheet, the state outline More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the High Court handed down on 20 March 2019, quashing the charges that the first and second respondents were facing in an ongoing criminal More
The court did not hear argument on the merits of this application, but determined it on the preliminary point of whether or not the matter had been properly brought before the Constitutional Court. More
Applications such as the one before me are quite rare. The applicant is the Prosecutor General. He is aggrieved by the decision of this Court, per CHIKOWERO J in case no. B 2202/20 made on 11 December, 2020 wherein the respondent herein, Musa Taj Abdul was admitted to bail by the learned Judge. More
1. This is an application for a civil forfeiture order brought in terms of SS 79 and 80 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24](“ the Money Laundering Act” or simply “ the Act”). The targeted property includes motor vehicles, shares and immovables. More
In 2013, Zimbabwe and Zambia successfully co-hosted the 20th United Nations World Tourism Organisation (“UNWTO”) Conference. The event ran for the period 25th to 30th August, 2013. More
This is a chamber application for an anti-dissipation interdict in which the applicant wants the respondents restrained from disposing of certain assets that it believes were acquired illegally. The application was made in terms of s 40 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act. More
This is a court application for a civil forfeiture order. The application was instituted in terms of s 80 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24]. The application is opposed by the respondents. More
This is an application for civil forfeiture made in terms of ss 79 and 80 of the Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime Act [Chapter 9:24] (“the Money Laundering Act”)
2. The applicant urges me to forfeit to the State the fifteen motor vehicles and two immovable properties on the basis that they are proceeds of serious crimes. The contention taken being that the first respondent raised money from unlawful activities and, to conceal the illicit origin of that money, used those funds to purchase the property sought to be forfeited. More
